In a world we call our home there's lots of room to roam

Plenty of time to turn mistakes into rhyme

(she/him), 23

markscherz:

herpsandbirds:

image
image

Indian Black Narrowmouth Frog aka “Space Frog” (Melanobatrachus indicus), family Microhylidae, Munnar, Kerala, India

photograph by Hadlee Renjith 

Look, I think it is important that as many people as possible see these phenomenal photos of Melanobatrachus indicus, because they are damn rare, but truly spectacular.

If anyone wants to know my favourite frog, this is probably in the top five.

Avatar
blessedislandofgoodboots:

honestly the series didn't pay enough attention to the fact that rachel is exclusively responsible for tobias and ax's wardrobes and they go along with her choices. (she instinctively buys designer underwear for erek, so i assume that she also buys designer underwear for the boys and thinks nothing of it.) this means that when the gang's out and about tobias and ax are wearing absolutely slammin' outfits and jake and marco are just...there

Avatar
andalitean:

Dheixjwodjekfn the juxtaposition when you see them in the mall food court…

Rachel tobias and ax look like they came from prep school

Cassie is wearing her comfy farmer core with the big galoshes

Marco has like a star trek graphic tee and khakis on probably

and Jake obviously sporting the matching neon nike shirt and basketball shorts combo

andalitean:

wolfziedraws:

image

Love a friend group where no one looks like they’re going to the same place

Holy shit. Real

hachama:

modern-politics111:

So it can’t get lost in reblog tags:

This article pulls zero punches. Incomplete list of potential triggers: miscarriage, medical neglect, loss of fertility, infant death, vomit, maternal trauma, mention of genetic and birth defects, and forced pregnancy.

The women named in this article have suffered, terribly, unnecessarily, because state law makers meddled in matters they didn’t understand.

queereldritchgalaxyprincess:

ritavonbees:

embracing the patterned ambiguity of gender and sex as more or less social constructs can grant you so much more precision in thinking about so many concepts in science.

like, if there was a study (and I’m just making this up as an example) showing women suffer from mosquito bites more than men do

you could do the ~“Gender Critical”~ thing and go “see!? mosquitoes get it!!”

OR

you could go “that’s interesting” and start asking more questions, like:

  • is this data self-reported? controlled?
  • were they studying the women or the mosquitoes?
  • did the study use methods that would let you tell the difference between “being bitten more often” and “noticing bites more often”?
  • did the study include any trans people and were their results any different? if yes were they on HRT or not?
  • how similar were the men and women in aspects other than gender? do we know their social class, jobs, diets, blood types?

because in fact the study i made up just then could lead to a huge variety of conclusions. from my description above you can’t tell the difference between studies that show:

  • mosquitoes are attracted to people with higher estrogen levels
  • mosquitoes are opportunistic and women spend more time near mosquito habitats for sociocultural reasons
  • every gender gets bitten about the same amount but men are socialised to pay less attention to physical discomfort so more of them don’t notice minor bites compared to women (and by more we mean like 60-40, this is a bell curve thing)
  • we accidentally got heaps of women in the study that have the mosquito’s favourite blood type and not so for the men, oops
  • mosquitoes are attracted to people with more x and y in their diets, which is currently mostly women for, again, largely sociocultural reasons

etc etc etc

you’re just not going to understand actual Gender Science, and therefore reality, if you can’t put “hmm, but what do they mean by woman this time” in your mental toolkit in a relatively neutral way.

Honestly this is a great way of presenting the kind of scientific literacy that is needed in an era of clickbait headlines and sound bites and facts that turn into memes; so much science “news” as reported by mass media distills nuanced studies into easily quotable and shocking one-liners that generally ignore the context behind the statistic.

Avatar
Anonymous:

“Intersex transfem” I bet you have fucking PCOS or some other practically female condition because you are obviously TME

Avatar
visible-schizo-spectrum:

i should not have to justify myself to u ppl but i digress

i was assigned male at birth, had IGM to look more typically male, and was raised as a perisex male until my 5-ARD diagnosis at 18. it took 3 different mental health professionals verifying that my schizophrenia was not the reason for my gender dysphoria to be allowed to start feminizing HRT at 14. i am as transfem as they come. just bcs i disagree w hating transmasculine ppl (and in ur case hating ctf intersex ppl?? lmao?? “practically female” no, intersex is intersex) does not mean i am not transfem. ppl can disagree w u w/o being transmasc so cope ig.

i think ppl w/pcos who identify partially or fully as transfem r super cool btw. intersex liberation forever i do not judge ppl’s relationship w transitioning to femininity based on how far i think their condition places them from biological femaleness. it’s none of my business and it’s none of urs.

visible-schizo-spectrum:

political-faggotry:

All that being AMAB or AFAB really means is that however many years ago, a doctor looked at a baby’s genitals and said “yep, (close enough to) a girl” or “yep, (close enough to) a boy”. It’s not a good framework to view oppression through.

everyone in the world should read this tbh